Legal Opinion
Broome v. Rodman Ford Sales, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 21, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.
The defendant, Rodman Ford Sales, Inc. (Rodman), appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, who, pursuant to G. L. c. 106, § 9-504(2), sought to recover a surplus realized on the disposition of the proceeds of the sale of an automobile following repossession. The sole issue raised is how the surplus after foreclosure should be computed.
The facts are undisputed to the following extent. On August 8, 1978, Rodman sold a 1976 Ford Granada Ghia to the plaintiff for $4,795. A “Massachusetts Automobile Retail Installment Contract” was executed between the plaintiff and Rodman to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Webster v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thrower v. Union Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Ferrous Financial Services Co. v. Self Loader Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Jack Abrams v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Holt v. Ellsworth Farmers Union Co-OpCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Thrower v. Union Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984