Legal Opinion

Jack Abrams v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1993No. 92-5568PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Jack Abrams appeals from a grant of summary judgment to defendant FDIC. The district court held, as a matter of law, that Abrams’s liability to the FDIC as successor in interest to a failed bank with which Abrams had a mortgage was not extinguished until the receipt, in cash, of all proceeds flowing from the sale of all property received in exchange for plaintiffs house. We reverse.

I

Jack Abrams took out a mortgage from Peoples Bank. He later went into arrears on the mortgage. Peoples repossessed the property and then agreed that Abrams would deed the property to the bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. Miller Yacht SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Jack Abrams v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Kentucky Joint Stock Land Bank v. Farmers Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Broome v. Rodman Ford Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Blackburn v. National Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eliseo Garcia v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of the United States Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  2. Lost Mountain Development Co. v. Rufus King v. Matthew B. KezarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Moser v. Medguard Alert, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API