Ertz v. Pierson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Albert Ertz, an infant, by Peter Ertz, his next friend, against Harry L. Pierson and Willis Hough, copartners as Pierson & Hough, for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by th& court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff, who, at the time of receiving the injuries hereinafter referred to, was a little less than 16 years of age, was employed by defendants in their harness-making establishment. He worked in the harness, department about a week. He then went into the stock room, and worked for a few days, and, on the 23d day of February, 1899, he was sent into the collar department, where he was instructed by the foreman to cut long straw with a hand machine, and lay it in bundles, and, when short straw accumulated, he was directed to run it through an Ohio feed cutter. He had never operated a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borck v. Michigan Bolt & Nut WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Allen v. JakelMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- St. Johns National Bank v. Township of BinghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Forquer v. Slater Brick Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Beghold v. Auto Body Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Berlin v. William B. Mershon & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Schoner v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.