Legal Opinion

Berlin v. William B. Mershon & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1903No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Snow, J. Case by August Berlin, by next friend, against William B. Mershon & Company, for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for personal injuries received while in its employ. At the close of the testimony, a request was made that a verdict be directed in favor of defendant. This request was refused. A good many assignments of error were made and argued by counsel, but the important question is whether a verdict should have been directed as requested.

The plaintiff was at work upon a planing and matching machine at the time of the injury. There is a dispute as to his age at that time. He claims he was but 16 years and 3 months old. The defendant claims he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borck v. Michigan Bolt & Nut WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Allen v. JakelMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Palmer v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ertz v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Journeaux v. E. H. Stafford Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forquer v. Slater Brick Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Beghold v. Auto Body Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Stam v. Ogden Packing & Provision Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hess v. Escanaba Woodenware Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Mushinski v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API