Legal Opinion

Schoner v. Allen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1909No. 50PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Logan County. Action by Mary Schoner against E. Jefferson Allen and Jerome McCarthy, partners as “Allen & McCarthy.” Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TüRNER, J.

On January 17, 1907, Mary Schoner, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued E. Jefferson Allen and Jerome McCarthy, partners as “Allen & McCarthy,” in the district court of Logan county in damages for personal injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted by them upon her minor child, Cath-arine R. Schoner, resulting to plaintiff in the loss of her services. To the petition, consisting of one count, defendants demurred, which was sustained and no exceptions saved. Subsequently, and by leave of court, plaintiff, on October 3, 190?, refiled said petition unchanged, except that,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Dowling v. Gerard B. Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duncan Cotton Oil Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Fisher v. PrairieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Neversweat Mining Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. HarlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API