Legal Opinion

Gorham v. . Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1938PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNHILL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2DissentDevin, J.

Civil action to recover on a policy of accident insurance.

Upon receipt of the payment in advance of the first annual premium of $52.50, the defendant, on 6 April, 1921, issued to Louis Rhodes Gorham a $2,500-policy of accident insurance, payable to his wife, plaintiff herein, as beneficiary in case of death of the insured through accidental means, containing, among others, the following provisions:

"The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California hereby insures Louis Rhodes Gorham . . . against loss of life…

3Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API