Legal Opinion

Karp v. Margolis

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1958No. Civ. 17720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *

Both sides being displeased -with the judgment, each has filed a separate appeal. To avoid confusion, reference to the parties will be that of plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the trial court, rather than as appellants and respondents.

In March 1953, plaintiffs borrowed $6,000 from defendants, which loan was secured by a deed of trust on a dry cleaning plant plaintiffs had built and were operating in Daly City. The plaintiffs having failed to make payments on the note as required, the trust deed was foreclosed and on September 1, 1954, the defendants bought…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Pickens v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Rutledge v. BargerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Calidino Hotel Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Berg v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Avina v. SpurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Haase v. LamiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API