Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1951No. Civ. 7970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from the judgments in two cases, consolidated for trial, the first brought by respondents for declaratory relief and the second brought by appellants for forcible entry.

In the complaint for declaratory relief it is alleged that the Pickenses, being owners of premises known as the Hawaiian Hut, leased the same to the Johnsons; that the lease contained a provision that the lessee would not permit any liens to he filed against the premises because of any contract of any nature made by the lessee and third parties; that the lease further provided that upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saferian v. BaerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Rutledge v. BargerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Calidino Hotel Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Pickens v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Martin v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Karp v. MargolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Rye v. Tahoe Truckee Sierra Disposal Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API