Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Barger

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1927No. Docket No. 3240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPinch, P. J.

— This is an action of forcible entry upon real property consisting of a lot and a store building thereon. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs for restoration of possession and for damages. The defendants have appealed from the judgment.

The evidence shows and the court found that in December, 1923, the defendants, as owners, leased the property to W. P. Rutledge and James Tully (plaintiffs herein) and William Pehr and C. C. Thomson, for a term of three years; that the lessees went into possession under the lease and conducted a grocery and general merchandise business in the building;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Badover v. Guaranty Trust Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. California Products, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Alvak Enterprises v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Saferian v. BaerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Hunt v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Pickens v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API