Legal Opinion
United States v. Hindman
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 15, 1960No. Civ. A. 450-59PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
The defendant is in the business of selling military uniforms to military personnel. On March 13, 1957, after a hearing under the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 41-58, wherein the defendant was charged with violating Section 5(a) of the Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a), the Commission issued a cease and desist order against the defendant, and others, which was duly served on the defendant on March 21, 1957. This order provided, as far as pertinent:
“It is ordered that * * * Seymour S. Hindman * * * directly or through any corporate or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Willard Tablet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Piuma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. PiumaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- State v. Credit Bureau of Laredo, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.