Legal Opinion
Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 12, 1970No. 7334_1PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
This case comes to us on cross-appeals from a final judgment in which the district court, on the basis of a special jury verdict, held that defendants Forster Mfg. Co. and Theodore R. Hodgkins 1 vio-lated section 2 of the Sherman Act and section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, by their use of various discriminatory pricing practices. The jury also found that these violations injured Farmington Dowel, a competing manufacturer of wooden skewers, in the amount of $109,-100, which amount was trebled by the district court and awarded to…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.