Legal Opinion

Piuma v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1942No. 9934PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

On April 6, 1937, in a proceeding under § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45, the Commission ordered appellant, Joseph A. Piuma, to cease and desist from directly or indirectly representing that Glendage — a nostrum sold and distributed by appellant in interstate commerce —(1) is a gland tonic; (2) will restore vigorous health; (3) is the best gland remedy known; (4) constitutes a remedy for glands; (5) is the last word in modem science in gland remedies, and stimulates all the glands to healthy activity; (6) is entirely unlike other so-called gland…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Joseph HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. United States v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API