Piuma v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
On April 6, 1937, in a proceeding under § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45, the Commission ordered appellant, Joseph A. Piuma, to cease and desist from directly or indirectly representing that Glendage — a nostrum sold and distributed by appellant in interstate commerce —(1) is a gland tonic; (2) will restore vigorous health; (3) is the best gland remedy known; (4) constitutes a remedy for glands; (5) is the last word in modem science in gland remedies, and stimulates all the glands to healthy activity; (6) is entirely unlike other so-called gland…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Joseph HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- United States v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.