Legal Opinion
Aronberg v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 28, 1942No. 7834PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Petitioner seeks to vacate an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing him to cease and desist from certain alleged unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of the pertinent Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 52, 55.
The complaint averred that petitioner, in selling, in interstate commerce, medicinal preparations for relief of delayed menstruation, known as “Triple-X Compound,” “Reliable Perio Compound,” “Perio Pills,” and “Perio Relief Compound,” falsely advertised that the compounds are effective, harmless remedies for such delay, accomplishing immediate effective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- DDD CORPORATION v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Ford Motor Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Dr. W. B. Caldwell, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Spradling v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Beneficial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Beneficial Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.