Legal Opinion
Gunther v. Lin
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 2006No. G036042PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. LEGAL BACKGROUND LEADING TO THIS CASE
In 1991—and the year is important as we shall later explain—our Supreme Court issued its opinion in Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 [278 Cal.Rptr. 614, 805 P.2d 873] (Harris), which, among other things, judicially construed the triggering language of section 52 of the Civil Code. Strictly speaking, section 52 is not part of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, which by its terms refers only to section 51 of the Civil Code (Gatto v. County of Sonoma (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 744, 757 [120 Cal.Rptr.2d 550] [“By…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Urhausen v. Longs Drug Stores California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.