Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed June 27, 2008, is hereby amended. With the filing of the Amended Opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants Lynn and Barbara Hubbard filed parallel claims for violations of both the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Disabled Persons Act (“CDPA”). Their complaint alleged barriers that deprived them of full and equal access to the restaurant operated by defendants-appellees SoBreck, LLC, dba Johnny Carino’s. We consider…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Frieda Klingebiel and Henry Klingebiel v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Mu Ying Wu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Robin Fortyune v. City of LomitaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jankey v. Song Koo LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Steve Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kohler v. Presidio International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.