Legal Opinion

Brunner v. United Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 21, 1983No. 68954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The insured unsuccessfully urged waiver and estoppel defenses in avoidance of the one-year period of limitations in his standard fire insurance policy. Judgment was entered for the insurer after bench trial of the coverage dispute, and the insured appeals. We affirm the trial court.

In seeking reversal, plaintiff David Brun-ner contends that the one-year period should not start until the insurer denies liability and that, in any event, waiver and estoppel were established as a matter of law in this case. Defendant United Fire & Casualty Company asserts that the first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Olson Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Shea North, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. State v. BoelmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. Fidata Trust Co. New YorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Albert v. Davenport Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Rushing v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Successor to Claims of First Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API