Legal Opinion

Bankers Trust Co. v. Fidata Trust Co. New York

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 21, 1990No. 89-657PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The principal issue in this case is whether the nonresident defendant had sufficient minimum contacts with Iowa to subject it to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state. An additional issue is whether defendant consented to jurisdiction in Iowa. The trial court overruled defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.

In 1983 General Growth Limited Partnership (General) decided to offer its shareholders subscription rights to additional shares. It hired Bankers Trust Company (Bankers) to act as its agent for the rights offering.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. City of Riverdale, Iowa v. Allen Diercks, Marie Randol, and Tammie PictonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. EnviroGas, L.P. v. Cedar Rapids/Linn County Solid Waste AgencySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Lindgren v. GDT, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
  5. Addison Insurance Co. v. Knight, Hoppe, Kurnik & Knight, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API