Legal Opinion

Rushing v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1986No. 85-587PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

This is an appeal from judgments by the district court in two postconviction relief actions brought by two inmates of the Iowa State Men’s Reformatory pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 663A (1983). These cases arose out of prison disciplinary proceedings. The district court granted the separate applications for postconviction relief, and the State appealed. We now reverse the judgments of the district court and uphold the adjustment committees’ disciplinary decisions.

During July and August 1984, in two unrelated incidents, applicants Tim Rushing and Douglas Smith, Iowa Men’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wilson v. FarrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Mahers v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. State v. Iowa District Court for Henry CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API