Pflanz v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sundermann, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Paul Pflanz appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of the defendant-appellee, the city of Cincinnati. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTS
{¶ 2} Pflanz was a Cincinnati employee from 1971 until July 7, 1995. In 1973, Pflanz began working as a firefighter. As part of his work, he received bomb training from the FBI. In September 1989, Pflanz injured his back when he attempted to catch a woman being transported on a stretcher when the stretcher latch failed. Sometime thereafter, Pflanz…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. Cleveland City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hollingsworth v. Time Warner CableOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- House v. Kirtland Capital PartnersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Young v. Stelter & Brinck, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Amesse v. Wright State Physicians, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.