Hollingsworth v. Time Warner Cable
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Patti Hollingsworth, appeals from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Time Warner Cable, a division of Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. (“Time Warner”). Hollingsworth assigns two errors: (1) that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Time Warner and (2) that the trial court erred in granting Time Warner’s motion for a protective order and denying her corresponding motion to compel discovery. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. Time Warner CableOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- King v. the Jewish HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2020
- Terrell v. Uniscribe Professional Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Brown v. Dover Corp., C-060123 (5-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.