Legal Opinion
Kim v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2000No. A087430PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
This appeal comes to us from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend on a third amended complaint for “wrongful termination and failure to pay overtime.” We affirm the judgment.
I. Background
Under the established rule that we treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pled but do not assume the truth of contentions, deductions or legal conclusions (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317]), appellant Jo Kim’s third amended complaint reveals the following: Kim was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mendoza v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Gibson v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN., CALIFORNIACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vergos v. McNealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Curcini v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Pointe San Diego Residential Community L.P. v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.