McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The issue is whether on the pleading and evidence the plaintiff 1 was entitled to an instruction on res ipsa loquitur. We hold that the plaintiff was entitled to the instruction.
This is an action to recover damages for physical harm to property and consequential damages incurréd in repairing the property. The plaintiff contends that negligence of the defendant caused a fire that resulted in physical harm to the plaintiffs property. The defendant denied that it was negligent or that it caused the fire. The defendant counterclaimed for damages, contending that the plaintiffs negligence caused…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Hagler v. Coastal Farm Holdings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Fieux v. Cardiovascular & Thoracic Clinic, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.