Legal Opinion
Buehler AG v. Ocrim, S.P.A.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 6, 1992No. Civ. 3:90-CV-0771-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SANDERS, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are the following sets of motions:(1) Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity and Unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 4,442,980 (Failure to Disclose PXC-M121 as Best Mode and Prior Art) and supporting memorandum, filed March 16, 1992; Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion, filed April 6, 1992; Defendants’ Reply, filed April 16, 1992; and Plaintiffs’ Surreply, filed August 6, 1992.(2) Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of U.S. Patent 4,442,980 and Listing of Undisputed…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- K & K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
- Buehler AG v. Ocrim S.P.A. Ocrim America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1993