Legal Opinion

Buehler AG v. Ocrim S.P.A. Ocrim America, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 17, 1993No. 4:90-cv-00771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SANDERS, Chief Judge.

A nonjm'y trial was held in this patent case on July 6-13, 1993. From the evidence produced at trial, the Court reaches the following decisions. With regard to Plaintiffs’ claim of infringement of United States Patent numbers 4,140,285 and 4,339,083, the Court finds for Defendants. The patents are infringed neither literally nor under the doctrine of equivalents.

With regard to Defendants’ counterclaim of invalidity and unenforceability of the patents in suit, the Court finds for Plaintiffs. On Defendants’ remaining counterclaims of antitrust,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Senior Technologies, Inc. v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2000
  2. Herr-Voss Corp. v. Delta Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  3. T & T GEOTECHNICAL, INC. v. Union Pacific Resources Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API