Legal Opinion
Burke v. APT FOUNDATION
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 12, 2007No. Civil 3:07cv820 (MRK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [doc. # 13] and Mr. Burke’s Motion to Appoint Counsel [doc. #5]. In their motion, Defendants argue that Mr. Burke’s claims should be dismissed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. Having considered the par ties’ briefs, including Mr. Burke’s responses [doc. ## 16, 22] to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss and DENIES AS MOOT Mr. Burke’s motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shahin v. DarlingDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Christian v. Town of RigaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Bernier v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Hedick v. SpradlingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Justo Vaillant v. Officer Constanza, Officer Chonerko, Officer Moan, and Officer ScaliseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.