Legal Opinion
School District v. Secretary of the United States Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 7, 2008No. 05-2708PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Breen, D.J.,
McKEAGUE, J. (pp. 273-84), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to decide a fundamental question of federal versus state funding under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (“NCLB” or “the Act”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301-7941. Plaintiffs-Appellants are school districts and education associations that receive federal funding under NCLB in exchange for complying with the Act’s various educational requirements and accountability measures. Based on the so-called “Unfunded Mandates Provision,” which provides that “[njothing in this Act shall…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- School District of City of Pontiac v. Secretary of US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- BD. OF ED. OF OTTAWA TP. HIGH SCHOOL v. SpellingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Bd Educ Ottawa 140 v. EDUCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pontiac School Dist v. Sec'y US Dept EdCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- School District of City of Pontiac v. Secretary of US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.