Legal Opinion

Bergen Hudson Roofing Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 28, 1989No. Court No. 81-12-01629Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

Plaintiffs attorney has filed an application seeking attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1982 & Supp. V 1987). Among the applicant’s burdens is the burden of alleging that the government’s position was not "substantially justified,” which shall be determined on "the record * * * which is made in the civil action for which fees and other expenses are sought.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (as amended). The applicant made its allegation and defendant responded indicating its reasons for non-capitulation at various stages. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. 1,378.65 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Vernon County, State of Missouri, and Laurance PhisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Devine v. SutermeisterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. James A. Bailey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Traveler Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API