Legal Opinion

United States v. Elbe Products Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 16, 1981No. C.A.D. 1267; No. 80-40PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Markey, Chief Judge.

The Government appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade 1 sustaining the claim of Elbe Products Corporation (Elbe) that the imported rolls of flexible nonwoven *73fabrics are properly classifiable under item 771.42, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), and refusing classification under item 355.25, TSUS. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The subject merchandise, imported by Elbe from Spain in November 1976, is described in entry papers as “Forrita 80” and “Plantilla 80” and consists of rolls of flexible nonwoven fabrics of man-made fibers coated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. N. D. Cunningham & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Elbe Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Elbe Products Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Spradling International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Takashima U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. V. G. Nahrgang Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API