Legal Opinion
Bauer v. Neuzil
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 1944No. Civ. A. 5821PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
The problems presented by this appeal arise out of an attack upon plaintiffs’ complaint, for when the first question was asked of the first witness, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the objection was sustained and a judgment dismissing the action was entered. Upon plaintiffs’ appeal from the judgment we have reached the conclusion that the complaint stated all the facts essential to a cause of action in unlawful detainer.
As a part of his objection that the complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lester v. IsaacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Painter v. BerglundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Earl Orchard Co. v. FavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Wrenn v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Jones v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- Lester v. BeerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.