Legal Opinion

Corwin Investment Co. v. White

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1932No. 23393. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the superior court of Yakima county, two actions were brought to recover back void taxes paid under protest. In one of the actions, there was a number of plaintiffs, and in the other, only one. The actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial, and will be treated here as one action. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, from which it was concluded that the taxes claimed could be recovered. From the judgment entered awarding to each of the plaintiffs the amount of- the void tax which it had paid, the defendant, Yakima county, appeals.

■ There is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Byram v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Tozer v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Pacific Coal & Lumber Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re the Sterilization of HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. North Bend Stage Line, Inc. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. King County v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API