Northern Cedar Co. v. French
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
The plaintiffs, including the inter-veners, in these various consolidated actions, sought to, enjoin the state director of agriculture from enforcing against them the commission merchants’ regulation act, Laws of 1923, p. 366 [Rem. 1923 Sup., § 8292]. They attack it as being wholly invalid and unconstitutional. Chamberlain & Company and the interveners allege that they are ordinary commission merchants, and that in years gone by they have built up a large business, and that, if the act in question is enforced against them, they will be greatly injured. The allegations of the Northern Cedar…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.