Legal Opinion

Northern Cedar Co. v. French

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1924No. 18267PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The plaintiffs, including the inter-veners, in these various consolidated actions, sought to, enjoin the state director of agriculture from enforcing against them the commission merchants’ regulation act, Laws of 1923, p. 366 [Rem. 1923 Sup., § 8292]. They attack it as being wholly invalid and unconstitutional. Chamberlain & Company and the interveners allege that they are ordinary commission merchants, and that in years gone by they have built up a large business, and that, if the act in question is enforced against them, they will be greatly injured. The allegations of the Northern Cedar…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API