Legal Opinion

Pacific Coal & Lumber Co. v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1925No. 18666. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Pacific Coal & Lumber Company, recovered in this action against the appellant, county of Pierce, for an excess payment of taxes. The taxes were levied for the year 1920, and were paid in the year 1921. The action to recover was commenced more than two years, hut less than three years, after the payment, and the sole question presented hy the appeal is whether it was commenced within the time limited hy law.

The statute, for the purpose of fixing periods of limitation for the commencement of actions, as is well understood, divides actions into different classes, based on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Soderberg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Allen v. StengerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Tozer v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Seattle v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Owings v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Byram v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Corwin Investment Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Eifler v. Shurgard Capital Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Clark v. LuepkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Adams County v. Ritzville State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API