Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2019No. 5:16-cv-06370Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC, 5 Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD Plaintiff, 6 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE v. EXPERT TESTIMONY 7 NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., Re: Dkt. Nos. 252, 254, 258, 260 8 LTD., et al., 9 Defendants. 10 Both parties have filed motions to strike the testimony of two of the other party’s expert 11 witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow 12 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

509 U.S. 579

(1993). The court presently considers those motions. This 13 order assumes familiarity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API