Legal Opinion

State v. Arend

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 2002No. C2-02-672PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s decision to award him one day of jail credit for each day he spent in the Sentence to Serve program because when he served an earlier sentence, each day in the program counted as two days off that sentence. Because we find that the district court’s decision accurately reflects the time appellant spent in custody, we affirm.

FACTS

On 9 February 1999, appellant Michael Arend, who was on probation for gross misdemeanor DWI, admitted to an Olmsted County corrections officer that he had cocaine in his possession. Based on that admission,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. ClarkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Simeon Leon Brooks v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API