Legal Opinion

State v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2001No. C3-00-1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORIS O. HUSPENI, Judge *

Upon revocation of his probation, appellant’s request for jail credit for time spent in a private residential treatment facility as a condition of probation was denied by the district court, on the grounds that Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines do not allow credit when probation time is spent in a treatment facility. Appellant argues that the decision of the district court constitutes a denial of equal protection under the law. Because there is a rational basis for granting jail credit to offenders who receive treatment while in state correctional facilities but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SerenaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. ArendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. HearstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Sadik Abdikadir Yusuf v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API