State v. Bradley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORIS O. HUSPENI, Judge *
Upon revocation of his probation, appellant’s request for jail credit for time spent in a private residential treatment facility as a condition of probation was denied by the district court, on the grounds that Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines do not allow credit when probation time is spent in a treatment facility. Appellant argues that the decision of the district court constitutes a denial of equal protection under the law. Because there is a rational basis for granting jail credit to offenders who receive treatment while in state correctional facilities but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SerenaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ArendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HearstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Sadik Abdikadir Yusuf v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.