Legal Opinion

State v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 2001No. C2-01-1388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

The state appeals from a pretrial order to suppress evidence obtained during a search of respondent’s property, arguing that even after supplying an omission, the warrant application set forth probable cause and that there was no evidence the omission was deliberate or reckless. Because we conclude that the issuance of the search warrant violated respondent’s due process rights, we affirm.

FACTS

The Isanti County Zoning Ordinance prohibited respondent Glenn Vernon Ak-ers from storing unlicensed vehicles on his property. After noting several unlicensed vehicles on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. McKownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ArendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph ShaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API