Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1996No. C4-95-2404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions of Kelvin Jackson for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals filed September 3, 1996 be, and the same are, granted for the limited purpose of making it clear that Jackson is entitled to an extra day of jail credit against his prison sentence. The precise issue is whether he is entitled to receive credit for the first and last day of any noncontinuous period of confinement in jail. We hold that he is entitled to credit for both the first and last day of the period in question.

Pe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State v. FolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Budds v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Olson v. RushfeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. ArendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API