State v. Clarkin

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the denial of jail credit,1 arguing that at the time he was arrested and incarcerated for violating the terms - of his supervised release, the state had probable cause to charge him with the harassment/stalking incident for which he pleaded guilty. Because the new offense was committed while appellant was on supervised release from a prior assault conviction and because the sentencing guide*150lines provide for a presumptive consecutive sentence for the new offense, we affirm.

FACTS

In April 2008, appellant Matthew Clar-kin was released from prison after…