Legal Opinion
In Re Arch Hurley Conservancy Dist.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1948No. 5008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Justice.
The appeal is from a decree of the District Court of Quay County, incorporating a certain portion of the right of way of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company in the Hudson Irrigation Extension of Arch Hurley Conservancy District, after overruling and dismissing the objections of Joseph B. Fleming and Aaron Colon as trustees of said railway company to the inclusion of such right of way within said Extension of the Conservancy District named. A separate appeal also was taken from last mentioned order. The Arch Hurley Conservancy District was organized under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- KANS. CITY SO. RY. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dallas Country Levee District No. 2 v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Daniels v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Tucumcari v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.