Legal Opinion

City of Albuquerque v. Chapman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1966No. 7746PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This action in eminent domain was brought under an act providing for special alternative procedure for condemnation of public and private property, Laws 1959, ch. 324, §§ 22-9-39 to 22-9-54, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. (Supp.1965). The appellee, the City of Albuquerque, sought to acquire a part of a tract of land owned by E. M. Chapman, Jr. and Virginia Chapman, his wife, for the improvement of Zuni Road. These appellants appeal from a judgment denying compensation or damages to them as a result of the taking.

Several points are raised by the appellants here. Basically, they…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Transwestern Pipe Line Company v. YandellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Iowa Development Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. State Road Department v. ChiconeSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. United States v. Cox United States v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Dahl v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Smith v. KlebanoffNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Galvan v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API