City of Tucumcari v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Chief Justice.
The appellant who was the plaintiff below seeks the review of a money judgment for $10,000 rendered against it in a condemnation proceeding instituted in the district court of Quay County and removed on change of venue from Quay County to Curry County where a jury trial was had. The judgment was in favor of Magnolia Petroleum. Company, the defendant below, as the reasonable value of property appropriated by the plaintiff, City of Tucumcari, in widening Highway 66, known also as Gaynell Avenue, within its corporate limits. The first question presented, and a decisive one…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Board of Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Peisker v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Lanier v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Transwestern Pipe Line Company v. YandellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Board of Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. PelletierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.