Legal Opinion
Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of Westchester
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 19, 1923No. 136PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Plaintiff in error, a New York corporation, seeks cancellation of an assessment of taxes upon its real property to pay for construction and operation of the Bronx Valley sewer. Westchester County, a necessary party under the local statute, demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it states no cause of action. The trial court over ruled the demurrer. The Appellate Division reversed the judgment — 193 App. Div. 433 — and the Court of Appeals affirmed this action, without opinion — 231 N. Y. 558.
The complaint alleges—
Plaintiff in error owns certain designated lands in West-chester County…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Borough of West Caldwell v. Borough of CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Browning v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Whitney v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1930
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.