Legal Opinion

Barna v. Passage 350 Canon

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1986No. B017910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order made pursuant to sections 583.310 and 583.360 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The two issues presented by this appeal are: whether, once a timely request for trial de novo has been made following court-ordered arbitration, section 1141.20 requires the case to be recalendared for trial by the court, sua sponte, in the same place it had prior to arbitration; and whether the five-year statute (§ 583.310), under these circumstances, remains tolled until the new trial date is set by the court. Because we answer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hartman v. SantamarinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hill v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Cannon v. City of NovatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Ward v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Baccus v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Porreco v. Red Top RV CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Sizemore v. Tri-City Lincoln Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API