Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1986No. B011912PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Duke Bingham, Jr. (Bingham), appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Joe Hill (Hill).

The trial court erred in granting Hill’s motion for reconsideration because Hill’s failure to act diligently to bring the action to trial within five years precludes him from benefiting from any exceptions which otherwise would have afforded relief from dismissal. Because the statutory period had run, the trial court was without jurisdiction thereafter to try the case. The judgment therefore is reversed.

Factual and Procedural Background

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Karubian v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Cannon v. City of NovatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Baccus v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Sanchez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Porreco v. Red Top RV CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API