Legal Opinion

Romine v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1988No. 162-87PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of misapplication of fiduciary property over $10,000, and assessed his punishment at 10 years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $10,000, but recommended that the confinement be probated. This conviction was affirmed on appeal. Romine v. State, 722 S.W.2d 494 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1986).

Appellant raises one ground for review, contending his indictment alleging both theft and misapplication of fiduciary property should have been quashed because of misjoinder. We agree with the Court of Appeals that denial of the motion to quash does not…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Romine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ponder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Sifford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  3. Lemos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  4. Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API