Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fortune v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1988No. 031-86PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was charged in a single indictment with burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit the felony offense of sexual assault and, by a separate count, aggravated sexual assault. The jury found him guilty and assessed punishment for the burglary offense at fifteen years imprisonment and thirty years imprisonment for the sexual assault. On appeal to the Beaumont Court of Appeals, the burglary conviction was affirmed, but the sexual assault conviction was reversed. Fortune v. State, 699 S.W.2d 706 (Tex.App.—Beaumont…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Meeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ex Parte SillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte DrakeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Ex Parte PenaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API