Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1988No. 924-85PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was charged in a single indictment with aggravated sexual assault and aggravated robbery with the same enhancement paragraph added to each count. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and was found guilty by the trial court of both offenses. After pleading true to the enhancement paragraphs, appellant was sentenced to thirty-five years for each of the offenses, the sentences to run concurrently.

The conviction was appealed to the First Court of Appeals on the grounds that the two offenses were improperly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Meeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ex Parte SillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  2. Ex Parte DrakeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Ex Parte PenaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API