Legal Opinion

Ponder v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1988No. 823-86PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 22.021(a)(4). The jury found true the enhancement allegations and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Austin Court of Appeals. Ponder v. State, 713 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.App.—Austin 1986). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court did not commit reversible error in overruling appellant’s motion to quash…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Maynard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Warmowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. Romine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API