Legal Opinion

State v. Higley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1989No. T7878A; CA A50131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence. ORS 813.010. He assigns as errors that the trial court denied his motion to postpone and “forced” him to proceed to trial without counsel. We affirm.

On May 20,1988, defendant was arrested. On June 7, the court set a trial date of July 20. On June 21, the state moved to postpone, because one of its police witnesses would be unavailable on July 20. The district attorney told the court that defendant did not oppose the motion. The court reset the trial for August 10. On July 26, the state again moved to postpone, because the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. SchmickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. ZahaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. MakinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. Consumer Sounding Board, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API