State v. Schmick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*229GILLETTE, P. J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of sodomy in the first degree and rape in the first degree, both class A felonies. He represented himself at trial. He now seeks a new trial on the ground that he was denied his right to a fair trial by the failure of the trial court to ensure that he had waived his right to assistance of counsel.1
When defendant first appeared for arraignment, on April 3, 1981, he appeared without counsel. The court ■determined that he was ineligible for court-appointed counsel, and the arraignment was continued. On April 6, he appeared with retained counsel,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. PfliegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. LingrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. FialaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MakinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.